They Knew the TGA Game of the Year Winner in Advance and Made Tens of Thousands of Dollars

marsbitPublished on 2025-12-12Last updated on 2025-12-12

Abstract

Summary: The 2025 TGA (The Game Awards) ceremony concluded with the indie game "Light & Shadow: Expedition 33" making history by winning both "Best Independent Game" and the coveted "Game of the Year (GOTY)" award, breaking a long-standing TGA curse. Prior to the event, the prediction market platform Polymarket had already listed the topic, with "Light & Shadow's" probability of winning GOTY consistently above 80% for over a month. Several traders, including users DieselDiesel, trumpnogo, and kasae, placed unusually large, concentrated bets on this outcome weeks in advance, a move that would have resulted in massive losses if wrong. Their bets appeared to be "all-in" convictions rather than calculated risks. Just three hours before the GOTY announcement, after the "Best Indie" award was given to the same game, a mysterious user (bobo9997) deposited $10,000 and bet it all on "Yes" for "Light & Shadow" winning GOTY at a price of $0.98 per share—a bet that would yield less than $200 in profit if correct. The final award confirmed the predictions. The early traders realized significant profits, with their winnings from this single event representing a large percentage of their total historical earnings on the platform (e.g., 176% for DieselDiesel). The article suggests these traders likely had insider knowledge of the results, using the prediction market as a anonymous, low-risk method to monetize their confidential information, turning a guaranteed outcome into thousands of d...

Today, the highly anticipated The Game Awards (TGA) ceremony finally concluded.

Let's jump back to 3 hours before the awards ended. At that time, the "Best Independent Game" had just been awarded to the popular title "Light & Shadow: Expedition 33," but this instead made many fans worried: historically, no game has ever won both the "Best Independent Game" and the "Game of the Year (GOTY)" awards at TGA. As a GOTY favorite, "Light & Shadow" now needed to break the curse that had existed since TGA's inception and create an unprecedented moment in gaming history.

Just as everyone was filled with anxiety, a mysterious individual registered an account on a seemingly unrelated "prediction market" platform and deposited ten thousand dollars. He found the topic "Will Light & Shadow win the 2025 GOTY?" on the platform and bet the entire ten thousand dollars on "Yes." At that time, the price for "Yes" was $0.98 per share, meaning that even if "Light & Shadow" did indeed make gaming history by winning both awards, his ten-thousand-dollar bet would only yield a profit of less than two hundred dollars. However, if "Light & Shadow" failed to break the TGA curse, the probability of the topic would instantly drop to 0, which meant his newly deposited ten thousand dollars would be wiped out. What kind of狂热 fan of "Light & Shadow" would take such a reckless risk? And how do prediction markets attract game fans from around the world to guess the winners in advance?

The "Pre-Determined" Script

As early as October 30th, a month and a half before the awards ceremony, the prediction market Polymarket had already launched the topic for "2025 Game of the Year." The probability of "Light & Shadow" winning was firmly pinned above 80% from the start, while the probabilities of other highly anticipated AAA titles winning were suppressed below 10%. Because such a one-sided situation usually only occurs in events where the outcome is already certain, this anomaly made many traders smell something unusual: this wasn't just optimism, this was certainty.

Among these traders with a "certain" attitude, a few operated in an extremely unified style, hinting at the possibility of insider trading. DieselDiesel, trumpnogo, and kasae all bet on "Light & Shadow wins TGA 2025 GOTY" when the probability was around 85%, and the amounts they bet were dozens or even hundreds of times larger than their usual bets. This highly concentrated,反常 betting behavior meant they faced enormous risks: if "Light & Shadow" ultimately did not win, they would not only have to give up all past profits but also suffer huge losses.

As time progressed and the probability of "Light & Shadow" winning increased, they did not sell any of their held shares to realize profits. Even 3 hours before the award announcement, after the "Best Independent Game" award had been announced, they, already significantly浮盈, remained motionless as if they knew the future, betting their entire account balance alongside the mysterious individual mentioned at the beginning for that final, tiny profit.

The Historic Award Moment and the Cashing Out of Insiders

Amid doubts and unease, TGA played out exactly like the script these few traders had arranged over a month ago, dispelling the final suspense: the highly anticipated "Light & Shadow," having already won the "Best Independent Game" award, broke the historical curse and won the Game of the Year award.

And while players on one side cheered and celebrated, the mystery was solved in the prediction market on the other side: the three traders who had been convinced since a month ago that "Light & Shadow" would win confirmed their role of "foreseeing the future" and realized huge profits:

DieselDiesel made a profit of $5,357 in this event, accounting for 176% of all his other trading profits;

trumpnogo made a profit of $2,958 in this event, accounting for 62% of all his other trading profits;

kasae made a profit of $1,658 in this event, accounting for 220% of all his other trading profits.

And the mysterious individual (bobo9997) mentioned at the beginning, because he was certain that "Light & Shadow" would make history," used ten thousand dollars to win a "whopping" $200.

"Even Those Who Foresee the Future Need to Eat"

The most noteworthy common point among these four traders is that while many players doubted whether "Light & Shadow" could break the historical curse, they were "willing to risk" nearly $100,000 in positions to "gamble" on this historic moment happening, and this "gamble" brought them less than two thousand dollars in combined profits.

Now, let's assume these "foreseers" are TGA vote auditing staff. As insiders with an annual income of $100,000, if they wanted to monetize the information in a traditional way, they would need to sell the insider information to media platforms, but this represents various potential fines, dismissal, and even imprisonment. However, with the emergence of prediction markets, they can use anonymity to convert information asymmetry into real money equivalent to 1 to 3 months of their disposable income.

When we view them as assumed insiders who already knew the result in advance, everything becomes clear: being 100% sure that "Light & Shadow" would be GOTY, their final "bet" was just using the one-hour wait time before the announcement to换取 seemingly huge risks but实际上毫无变数的 two thousand dollars in profit. This kind of seemingly high-risk but实际上毫无变数的赚钱 "bet" was almost impossible to encounter before platforms like prediction markets appeared.

However, with the popularity of Polymarket, how many people can resist converting information into real money anonymously?

Short squeeze or structural shift? Here’s why MYX’s price rally is drawing attention

MYX Finance's token price surged 8% in 24 hours, breaking the key $3 resistance and reaching a local high of $3.9. While technical analysis indicated a bullish breakout with high trading volume and a $3.45 target being achieved, futures data revealed mixed signals. Open Interest declined and funding rates turned negative, suggesting a possible short squeeze that could lead to a swift reversal. Despite this, the overall structure remains bullish, with a demand zone around $3.33-$3.52. A drop below $3.26 would invalidate the bullish outlook, but a bounce toward $4.2 appears more likely. Traders are advised to maintain a cautious yet optimistic bias, considering buying around $3.4-$3.5.

ambcryptoHace 2 min(s)

Short squeeze or structural shift? Here’s why MYX’s price rally is drawing attention

ambcryptoHace 2 min(s)

Tether’s Bold $1.1 Billion Juventus Play Shut Down As Exor Holds Firm

Tether's attempt to fully acquire Italian football club Juventus has been rejected by the club's majority shareholder, Exor. The holding company, which controls a 65.4% stake, stated it has no intention of selling its shares to Tether or any third party. Tether, which already owns a 10% minority stake, had offered a significant premium per share, valuing the club at approximately $1.17 billion. The stablecoin issuer had also pledged an additional 1 billion euro investment to support the club. The rejection comes as Juventus has faced sporting and financial challenges in recent years. Despite the setback, Tether's USDT stablecoin continues to see growth, with its market cap reaching a new all-time high.

bitcoinistHace 3 min(s)

Tether’s Bold $1.1 Billion Juventus Play Shut Down As Exor Holds Firm

bitcoinistHace 3 min(s)

The Economist: The Real Threat of Cryptocurrency to Traditional Banks

The Economist article "The Real Threat Cryptocurrency Poses to Traditional Banks" examines the escalating tensions between the traditional banking sector and the crypto industry. Despite both benefiting from a more favorable regulatory environment, especially following the passage of the GENIUS Act which provided a legal framework for stablecoins, a significant power shift is occurring. Banks' most immediate concern is regulatory arbitrage in stablecoins. Although the GENIUS Act prohibits issuers from paying interest to prevent deposit outflows, companies like Circle circumvent this by sharing revenue with exchanges, which then pay "rewards" to users. Banks are demanding this loophole be closed. Furthermore, crypto firms are breaking into the core of the financial system. In a landmark move, U.S. regulators granted national bank trust charters to five digital asset firms, including Circle and Ripple, allowing them to provide custody services nationwide. The collective impact of these developments poses a profound threat. The core of the banks' dilemma is their waning political influence. Crypto has firmly entrenched itself within the right-wing, anti-establishment political sphere, amassing a massive war chest for lobbying. Banks are no longer the most powerful financial voice in the Republican party. In a ironic twist, they now sometimes find themselves allied with Democratic senators and left-leaning groups who share concerns over stablecoin risks, proving that political alliances in this battle are increasingly unpredictable.

深潮Hace 8 min(s)

The Economist: The Real Threat of Cryptocurrency to Traditional Banks

深潮Hace 8 min(s)

Ripple’s RLUSD stablecoin goes multichain in new pilot

Ripple is expanding its RLUSD stablecoin to multiple layer-2 blockchains—including Optimism, Base, Ink, and Unichain—through a pilot program with cross-chain protocol Wormhole. This move aims to support a multichain future and improve scalability and interoperability. Unlike wrapped assets, RLUSD will use Wormhole’s Native Token Transfers to move across chains without fragmenting liquidity. The full rollout, pending regulatory approval, is planned for next year. Launched in late 2024, RLUSD currently has a market cap of $1.3 billion and is positioned as a regulated stablecoin bridging DeFi and institutional finance.

cointelegraphHace 10 min(s)

Ripple’s RLUSD stablecoin goes multichain in new pilot

cointelegraphHace 10 min(s)

Crypto Liquidation Wipes Out $584M in Overleveraged Bull Bets

A major liquidation event on Monday wiped out over $584 million in leveraged cryptocurrency positions, affecting nearly 182,000 traders. Bullish bets suffered the most, accounting for 87% of the total losses. Bitcoin and Ethereum saw forced closures of $174 million and $189 million, respectively, as prices fell below key support levels. The sell-off, largely driven by overleveraged long positions rather than fundamental market weakness, triggered cascading liquidations—particularly on Binance, Bybit, and Hyperliquid, which handled 75% of the activity. Despite the sharp decline, spot prices stabilized, suggesting the event was more about excessive leverage than a broader shift in sentiment. Altcoins like Solana and Dogecoin also experienced significant liquidations.

TheNewsCryptoHace 24 min(s)

Crypto Liquidation Wipes Out $584M in Overleveraged Bull Bets